-
Archives
- April 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- June 2010
- January 2010
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- February 2006
-
Meta
Category Archives: Legal theory
What is Satire
Harold Gotthelf, Professor of Satire wrote this entry on parody and satire in fair use, in response to my recent Slate piece on Fair Use. Satire is a purposeful art; it attempts to unmask folly that is posing as wisdom, … Continue reading
Posted in Legal theory
Leave a comment
Huxley
Huxley had alot of it figured out. His essay the Final Revolution (1959), is interesting, somewhat a prequel to Larry Lessig’s Code — a Code 0.1 you might say. (though I guess you might also say that of Brave New … Continue reading
Posted in Legal theory
Leave a comment
The Lifeworld revisited
I have never been the biggest fan of Jurgen Habermas- he is hard to understand, and his interest in never-ending public sphere dialogue remind me of an endless faculty meeting. But I must admit that lately I’ve been turned on … Continue reading
Posted in Legal theory
Leave a comment
Structural Separation
I’m in the midst of a long debate with Derek Slater (of Google) about structural separation. He may post about it more on the Google policy blog at some point. The key question is, when can an industry cut … Continue reading
Posted in Legal theory
Leave a comment
While I’ll always be a legal realist
I reread today Felix Cohen’s 1935 classic and became convinced that Columbia ought rededicate itself to the cause of functionalism in the legal system. I was also reminded of the reason law reviews articles today are rarely read: it’s because … Continue reading
Posted in Legal theory
Leave a comment