iPhone
Friday, June 29th, 2007Like everyone else, impossible not to write about the iPhone. I have a new piece in Slate arguing that the iPhone — at least this incarnation — is revolutionary in terms of interface, but much less in terms of industry structure and business model.
I want to respond to two things that people have said about the piece — trying, though probably failing, to not be too ornery:
1. Yes, I know that today’s “at&t” isn’t exactly the same company that was founded in 1878.
However, it has more of the components of the old AT&T than any other company; and to my mind it is worth connecting today’s AT&T with that company.
2. I am also well aware of the difference between CDMA and GSM phones — and that unlocking the iPhone, as it exists right now, would not necessary mean much for someone who wanted to use the iPhone on Verizon’s networks. However, the broader point is that Apple could try to create a phone that works on any network (CDMA or GSM) — or at least build an open CMDA phone, and also an open GSM phone, and sell those — and perhaps one day it will.
The real point of the piece was the “trojan horse” argument at the end of it. That is, I think Apple is playing by the rules now — but once it gets deeper into this industry, it will start changing things.


